Skip to main content

Ahli Parlimen Bachok gempur parlimen isu royalti minyak Kelantan.

























Sumber berita FAKAP

Comments

  1. wah!!!... ni baru btol- btol pemimpin PAS.... mana ada pemimpin lain tanya apsal royalti minyak tu.... tup-tup.... si Nahs plak tanya..... beraninya dia tanya pasal tu kat Najib... hehehe

    -abanghensem

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Racial polarisation in the country is not caused by the country vernacular school system but more by the government political, education and economic discriminative policies." - an educationist said today.

    The prime minister and all the Umno ministers will never admit that polarisation arises more out of the race-based policies and privileges one race gets over another.

    Similarly, there are other areas of our daily lives where terminologies used have made us view certain practices as privileges rather than sacrifices. For instance, the bumi discount for houses.

    The total sale value to the developer is still the same. It is just that the non-malay buyer is likely to be required to pay for some of the discount given to the malays.

    But the longer the NEP policies continue and the greater the vehemence with which Umno politicians issue threats, terminologies will change and more people will talk about these practices or policies in words that may not sound as pleasing to the ears of the beneficiaries.

    Obviously, at that point we shall probably see a new round of discriminations and disagreements. Unfortunately, as long as only weak people take on leadership roles within Umno, threats will continue, NEP policies will be sustained and corruption will prevail.

    That unfortunately is the legacy we have as Malaysians.

    The basic building blocks of unity, whether you are uniting different ethnic groups in a country or trying to re-engineer a corporation of differing cultural values, are the same.

    The principal parties have to be treated as equals - nor special privileges no favours that would favour one group over another. Any privilege that is given should be given to all on the same basis - for example, special privilege given to the financially poor regardless of race or ethnic origin.

    It is only on this equitable footing that you can foster true nationalism and build lasting unity, since each component group will have the same stake in the nation and has equal likelihood in reaping the rewards or suffering the consequences.

    My recommendation to the government, not simply as a businessman but also based on pragmatism, is not to waste any more taxpayer ringgit on nationalism programmes until it has established the pre-conditions for its success.

    What is sad is that, after almost five decades of independence, we have been unable in Malaysia, to bring globally-vision leaders to the forefront - leaders who can see beyond racial boundaries to recognise the immense sociological and economic potential that can benefit all Malaysians.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is the language diversity in our educational system a stumbling block to so-called "national unity"? Despite the insistence of this idea by the self-interested ruling elite, it is simply wrong.

    And the common use of English did not stop Americans from fighting Britons in the War of Independence. And let us not forget the American Civil War - both sides spoke English.

    And to the contrary, we see Europeans of different mother tongues coming together in a democratic manner to forge a united continent in the form of the multilingual European Union with common standards of human rights, governance and democracy.

    English-speaking people with different mother tongues are also now living peacefully in five different sovereign and independent countries namely the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand.

    It is time for the Malaysia ruling elite and their ideologues to stop spreading the voodoo of that language diversity hampers national unity.

    The root cause of national disunity is none other than the existence of race-based political parties like UMNO, MIC and MCA, which perpetuate race-based affirmative action policies and which only benefit the upper class BN gangs and their sons, daughters and cronies.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The truth is that the ability of education to bring people together is limited. On top of that, education - at least secular one - is about the pursuit of knowledge and truth, and hence whatever is taught in schools should be based on the reality and truth in order to unite the students.

    But when our society is already polarised by the laws and other economic realities, and we tell our children otherwise in school, it is likely that the unity lessons will never stick for long or even worse result in a backlash.

    What is more distressing is the fact that national education policy is only meant for the masses while our political leaders send their children overseas. Can we believe they have faith in our own educational facilities and that they are sincere in wanting the best for us?

    In Malaysia, unfairness is institutionalised. For example, it is alright for certain schools or universities like the Universiti Institut Teknologi Mara to bar non-malays.

    So it piques me to hear some blaming vernacular schools for racial tensions. Vernacular schools have never barred malays from enrolling into them unlike Mara educational institutions. If vernacular schools are to be blamed, so too must the Mara institutions.

    (A minister responsible for higher education who can make such inflammatory statements confirms that the so-called meritocracy system of university entrance is a sham, since he was able to promise that the percentage for malay applicants will never fall below the previous quota percentage.

    Is he suggesting that we should rejoice over our poor education? Please do not confuse quality with quantity.)

    I cannot help but think that the politicians have an ulterior motive. If so, please be honest and brave enough to admit it.

    With such narrow-minded people in charge, it is difficult to have confidence in any of their suggestions.

    When it came to choosing a career, I avoided public services for the fear of being excluded from promotions just like how I was excluded from matriculation etc. Many employers are also very racially defined.

    Now, as much as I miss hanging out with people of other races, I end up being with people of my own race.

    Looking back, I don't think our primary vernacular system is the cause of disunity. On the contrary, it enriches our Malaysia heritage. The real problems are with the uneven playing fields that split malays and non-malays from secondary school onwards.

    Another examples are the Chinese Indonesians. Most of them don't even speak their mother tongue, nor do they even carry Chinese names anymore, yet come any major political turmoil, they are targeted by the majority. Is this due to vernacular education?

    The government should be aware of the fact that the number of Chinese schools has not increased over the past 30 years despite the need for them due to increased demand from both Chinese and non-Chinese students.

    The diversity of education methods in the country is a national treasure and should be upheld. Unity will come from mutual respect and fair treatment for all - not necessarily from a uniform education.

    Whether they will take concrete steps to address the imbalance is another matter for, while I am optimistic about the people of Malaysia, I have very little faith in politicians.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ni apa hal lak cakap omputih kat sini. AT bukan paham pun
    (gua pun he he)

    ReplyDelete
  6. mi no spik inglish kata pak ngah tukar tiub

    ReplyDelete
  7. ADUKA TERUNA,hang kalau jahil sekalipun,jgn lah terang2 tunjuk dkt org,buat malu hang dan keluarga hang saja.Kalau hang tak reti dgn adab dan cara org agama berhujah dgn dalil dan ilmu,lebih baik hang duk diam,jgn duk tulis,mengata,maki hamun alim ulamak.Org buka islam jer yg jenis tak kenalalim ulamak ni...hang aku tak tau la..

    ReplyDelete
  8. klik pada link , bukan nasha yg cakap kat najib tetapi salahudin ayob yg kata kat najib..

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear julee,
    Ur quote : "Is the language diversity in our educational system a stumbling block to so-called "national unity"? Despite the insistence of this idea by the self-interested ruling elite, it is simply wrong. "

    Language diversity is not a stumbling block towards unity BUT refusing to respect Bahasa
    Malaysia as a language of
    malaysians thus uniting the people IS the stumbling block.

    Like it or not BM is the national language,k...
    Please have some respect.

    I once was approached by a chinese friend and he was criticising The GMP(Gerakan mansuhkan PPSMI-wonder if u know what group this is??) for making a fuss over teaching maths and science in english and demand it to be taught in english instead.
    He went bla bla bla saying english is important and we need english to advance and develop,etc,etc...

    I asked him,why argue the GMP only but not the vernacular schools who insisted both subjects to be taught in chinese and tamil?
    As the vernacular schools are interested in making sure their sudents understand the subjects better,so does the GMP.

    See...How bias you all treated malays and BM.

    ANYway I MUST SAY THAT I AGREE WITH THIS QUOTE OF YOURS:
    *the words in brackets were added by me.. ;)

    "(One of the )The root cause(s) of national disunity is none other than the existence of race-based political parties like UMNO, MIC and MCA, which perpetuate race-based affirmative action policies and which only benefit the upper class BN gangs and their sons, daughters and cronies."

    ReplyDelete
  10. wow hebat seh nasha!

    hehehe

    jgn harap!

    ReplyDelete
  11. YES to fuaad.sabki sure it is the system itself we've to query. Why revert to solely English (PPSMI) if the vernacular system permits national language or any other languages for better understanding in teaching & learning. It created disaster since pupils could not understand the questions given. Albeit, the XM results were for all to see (if the minister have any?) that it's getting bad to worse with years went by. Of course some urban schools could succeed so let them be.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ADUKA TERUNA,hang kalau jahil sekalipun,jgn lah terang2 tunjuk dkt org,buat malu hang dan keluarga hang saja.Kalau hang tak reti dgn adab dan cara org agama berhujah dgn dalil dan ilmu,lebih baik hang duk diam,jgn duk tulis,mengata,maki hamun alim ulamak.Org bukan islam jer yg tak hormat dan memuliakan ulamak.Hang aku taktau lah..

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nasha,mustapha ali,hassan ali jelas jenis manusia yg munafik.Guna agama untuk kepentingan dunia..kalau ikhlas berjuang untuk agama,sila letak jawatan dgn cara terhormat..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Komen berbentuk fitnah, ugutan dan ancaman akan dipadam. Segala tulisan komen adalah tanggungjawab pemberi komen. Blog ini tidak bertanggungjawab keatas komen-komen diruangan ini.

Popular posts from this blog

Ulasan gua PRK Kajang

Try ulas buat kali terakhir untuk PRK Kajang. Ini pendapat gua atas premis perbahasan yang boleh ditolak. No prob. Small matter. 1. Gua menolak logik MB, Putrajaya, Mahathir vs Najib, tangisan Rafizi, bla bla sebagai alasan PRK Kajang. Sebenarnya, pendapat gua, kehadiran Anwar secara rasmi dalam DUN Selangor adalah satu mandat tanpa rasmi mengambil Pengerusi PKR negeri Selangor dari Azmin. Di Selangor, wujud ketidak selarasan kuasa. MB vs pengerusi negeri. Seumpama MB Kelantan adalah Nik Amar. Tapi PJ Kelantan adalah Husam. Anwar tak berani mengambil pengerusi negeri dari Azmin secara rasmi. Sebabnya banyak spekulasi. Azmin ada 12 orang yang akan lompat / bebas, Azmin ada video, Azmin ada fail, anak Azmin ada DNA Anwar (hujah seks UMNO) bla bla bla. Sidang media Azmin pun menyaksikan kenyataan berunsur sinis. Seperti Anwar bukan sahaja diperlukan di Kajang, tetapi dunia seperti Timur Tengah (Malaysiakini). Dengan Anwar di dalam DUN Selangor, maka pengimbangan berlaku antar

Betul ke Islam yang kau anut?

Betul ke versi Islam yang kau anut sekarang ni? KALAU KAU NAK VERSI PENUH BERVIDEO, KLIK SINI: https://youtu.be/KmJOEreKp6o Sekarang abam nak bagi anti thesis kepada thesis yang dah establish sekarang ini. Bila ada yang kemukakan hujah balas, akan ada spark ilmu yang dapat dikutip dan dinilai. Islam sekarang ni banyak versi. Nak2 pula versi politik parti. Kecilkan lagi skop, Dulu UMNO kafir, kekalkan perlembagaan kafir adalah kafir, tak boleh bayar zakat pada ulul amri yang tak laksanakan hudud. Macam2. Naratif dan kebentukan agama itu bergerak ikut survival parti politik. Kita ambil skop besar. Begitu juga kumpulan Islam selepas Muawiyah-Aishah memerangi ulul amri Ali as. Kumpulan2 berkembang dan terus berperang merebut kaabah. Dapat kaabah, dapatlah pengaruh agama. Dalam proses peperangan, pergaduhan merebut pengaruh itu, kau bayangkan berapa banyak hadis, naratif, kata2 mutiara, kitab2, fatwa2, pandangan2 telah dicipta. Untuk dapatkan pengaruh. Sama macam abam cakap dalam skop n

E wallet rupanya voucher potongan harga.

Abam setuju imbuhan wang bagi galakkan rakyat buat sesuatu. Macam download app untuk mudahkan kerajaan. Untuk kesejahteraan rakyat sendiri. Ianya sama macam paksa bayar wang (saman) bagi galakkan rakyat JANGAN buat sesuatu. Tapi pundek apakah imbuhan dalam bentuk potongan harga ini?   Ada si bangang kata e wallet PH dulu bangang sebab ada tarikh luput. Tarikh luput la sebab nak galakkan download dan guna e wallet. Pengguna dan peniaga. Bukan suh simpan RM30 tu dalam almari macam Armada. Tapi, ini lebih bangang. Imbuhan dalam bentuk potongan harga. Bagi jer la terus. Dia beli barang apa pun bernilai RM50.